The Results: 94.6% Cost Reduction and Precision Risk Focus
Within a test group of 149 suppliers, just 8 entities accounted for more than 90% of all identified human rights warnings.
The outcomes of the AstraZeneca-FRDM engagement were both statistically striking and operationally transformative. Within a test group of 149 suppliers, the deep-tier analysis revealed that just 8 entities accounted for over 90% of the identified human rights warnings. This extreme concentration of risk meant that AstraZeneca could redirect virtually all of its due diligence resources toward a tiny fraction of its supplier base—achieving a 94.6% reduction in due diligence costs without sacrificing compliance rigor.
This level of specificity enabled AstraZeneca to prioritize engagement, focus due diligence efforts, and align remediation strategies with the most credible and material risks. Rather than spreading resources thin across hundreds of suppliers with unknown risk profiles, the compliance team could now act with precision—targeting the exact entities and supply paths that presented the greatest exposure. The result was a shift from abstract ESG concern to concrete accountability and actionable remediation steps.
As ESG expectations and regulatory scrutiny continue to increase—driven by laws such as the EU Forced Labor Regulation (EUFLR) and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), as well as evolving corporate disclosure requirements—this work helps position AstraZeneca to meet those demands with defensible, data-driven action. The engagement demonstrated that deep-tier supply chain intelligence is not just a compliance tool, but a strategic asset that fundamentally changes the economics of responsible sourcing.