READING TIME:
5
MIN

Why it matters

Australia's current Modern Slavery Act requires entities with at least A$100 million in annual consolidated revenue to publish annual statements about modern slavery risks.

The proposed reforms would raise the stakes considerably. Modern slavery compliance would no longer be primarily about publishing a report. Companies would need evidence that their risk controls actually work.

TRUSTED BY FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES

What could change

Penalties, a "reasonable steps" defense, and stronger enforcement tools are on the table.

Under the government's proposed crackdown:

  • Large companies could face fines or criminal action for failing to prevent modern slavery.
  • Taking "reasonable steps" to prevent exploitation would provide a legal defense.
  • Regulators could gain stronger enforcement tools.
  • Consultations will also consider remedies for victims and a deferred prosecution agreement framework.

The fine print: The size of the penalties, and exactly what qualifies as reasonable steps, has not been decided.

The reforms remain under development and are not yet enacted into law. But the direction is unmistakable: disclosure alone will not be enough.

The reality check


Statements haven't reduced exploitation — and now trade pressure is compounding the risk.

Since 2019, more than 17,000 modern slavery statements covering over 27,000 businesses have been submitted to Australia's public registry.

Yet a 2023 review found no hard evidence that the law had produced meaningful change for people experiencing modern slavery.

Translation: More statements have not necessarily meant less exploitation. That's not good.

The proposed duty is designed to close that gap by shifting the focus from what companies say to what they can prove they did.

It's Not Just You, Australia

Australia is also facing international pressure. The United States has proposed additional tariffs of up to 12.5% on imports from economies it considers insufficiently active against forced-labor goods. Countries with stronger forced-labor controls may qualify for a lower proposed rate.

The bigger picture: Human rights risk is becoming trade risk. Companies that cannot trace their supply chains may face more than reputational damage. They could encounter penalties, market-access restrictions and higher import costs.

What do you need to know?

Four actions to start now — and how FRDM covers them without another questionnaire.

Waiting for the final definition of "reasonable steps" is risky. Strong due diligence takes time to build.


Start with four actions:

  1. Map beyond Tier 1. Modern slavery risks are often buried among subcontractors, labor providers and raw-material suppliers.
  2. Prioritize the highest risks. Focus resources using supplier, commodity, geographic, ownership and adverse-media intelligence.
  3. Act on what you find. Assign mitigation measures, engage suppliers and establish escalation and remediation processes.
  4. Preserve the evidence. Keep a defensible record of assessments, decisions, supplier engagement and corrective action.

An annual questionnaire isn't going to work anymore.


We Were Born For This


FRDM transforms basic supplier data into multi-tier supply chain intelligence—without waiting for every supplier to complete another questionnaire.

Teams can use FRDM to:

  • Map direct and indirect supplier relationships.
  • Prioritize suppliers requiring deeper investigation.
  • Monitor emerging risk signals.
  • Manage mitigation and supplier collaboration.
  • Generate audit-ready compliance evidence.

DOWNLOAD FRDM EXPLAINER

Get access to the
latest supply chain resources

*not sales material disguised as 'resources.'

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form. Please try again.

Know your supply chain. Act on the risks. Prove what you did.

Australia's proposed reforms signal the end of modern slavery reporting as a box-checking exercise. The emerging standard is simple: know your supply chain, act on the risks, and prove what you did.